Here are two updates on the two wildly different camera stories I've posted about in the last month.
The first is the story of the Good Samaritan who is trying to find the proper owner of the lost camera (see the full story here).
The camera was found in London, England, and has "300 pictures dating back to January 2005. Most of the pictures are family pics showing a young child playing, and some more recent ones include a new baby. There are a few movies on the chips."
The Good Samaritan wants to point out that the language on the movie clips is Italian, not Spanish, as he thought earlier.
Then, sadly, there is the story of the Bad Samaritans. This couple notified the camera's owner that they found it, but then they decided to keep it because their 9 year old son had just been diagnosed with diabetes and considered the finding of the camera good luck (see the full story here).
As you might expect, there was a storm of outrage against this anonymous couple. Many people urged Judith, the owner of the stolen camera, to go to the media and to pursue matters with the police.
Judith has put the following update on her blog:
· "On the legal front, the police are still working on it, and apparently making some progress.
· On the journalism front, expect some stories in the next week, mostly about the whole web phenomenon aspect of this thing.
· I've had no further contact with the family.
· I've accepted no offers of money or cameras. Anyone who wants to donate is encouraged to donate to the Juvenile Diabetes Foundation."
I saw the story in Saturday's Leader-Post, so word is starting to circulate in the media.
Judith is honourably not naming the family, other to say that they live in Ontario.
However, the public knows that there is a couple with a 9 year old son recently returned to Ontario from Hawaii. The son has just been diagnosed with diabetes (and suddenly has an expensive new camera).
How long can it be before someone figures out who the family is and leaks word to the media? And then what happens?